|
|
|
Rediscovering AMC Muscle Cars
Rediscovering AMC performance machines
Harold Pace / autoMedia.com
|
If there ever was a company least likely to build hot street
machines in the 1960s, it had to be American Motors. Back in 1954,
independent auto manufacturers Nash and Hudson merged to form American Motors
Corporation (AMC), but soon the Hudson name was dropped. Rather than battle
directly with the Big Three in Detroit, little AMC (based in Kenosha,
Wisconsin) designed a line of smaller, economical sedans. These practical,
albeit boring, vehicles were called Ramblers, and no serious driver paid them
the slightest bit of attention. But all that was soon to
change.
By the mid-1960s AMC was in trouble. Baby boomers were looking
for fast, sporty transportation and the little Rambler was most emphatically
not that. AMC even ran ads decreeing auto racing and street-car performance.
But the bottom line was slipping at AMC and the directors were desperate to
breathe some life into their moribund lineup. Then, in 1964, the radical new
Ford Mustang rocked the automotive world. AMC knew which direction the future
pointed.
In desperation, AMC shoehorned its new 290- and 343-inch V-8s
into various existing Rambler models. These had performance potential but
were still saddled with the styling charisma of a cereal box. They tried
slapping a fastback top on the old Rambler Classic and called it the Marlin,
but anyone who caught one threw it back.
The Javelin Strikes
In 1968 AMC finally got it right. Despite being late into the
fight, with the Mustang, Camaro, Firebird, Barracuda and Cougar already
competing for "pony car" buyers, the new Javelin was worth the
wait. Penned by AMC head stylist Dick Teague, the Javelin wore a distinctive
twin-opening grille and a graceful fastback top that looked as good as
anything on the market.
The Javelin's base engine was an anemic six, but 290 and
343-inch V-8s provided serious performance. These new AMC V-8s were all based
on the same basic block design, and it was soon stretched to 390 inches, and
315 horses by mid-1968. Buyers had the choice of a so-so Warner automatic
transmission, 3-speeds (for smaller engines) or the excellent Borg-Warner
T-10 4-speed manual with close-ratio gears.
Copyright autoMedia.com 2000-2008
|
|
|
|
|
|

C1 (1953-196...
|
|

1972
|
|
|
|
Re: Why is my car overheating?My guess is what you're experiencing is every rubber part in the car dying at once. Have you ever changed the radiator hoses? Heater hoses?
Another g ... more... |
Re: engine smoke
How big was the overhaul? Could be poorly installed rings. Did the guy hone the bore?
Did he replace the valve guides?
I'd take it back to h ... more... |
|