Reviews
Print this Email this diggDigg this! del.icio.us
2003 Acura CL Type-S front driving
Continued from Page 1

Inside, the CL 3.2 Type-S carries on a styling motif that parallels its subtle exterior treatment. Well-formed buckets offer good combination of comfort and support, and the well-organized cockpit puts all major controls within easy reach, offsetting the monochrome leather look with tasteful titanium accent trim. About the only functionality issue that arises involves the bespoke backlit black-on-white gauges. While admittedly adding a bit of flair, their legibility suffers palpably anytime the lights are switched on when it's not completely dark outside. Despite its coupe configuration, the CL's rear quarters do a decent job of handling a pair of modestly scaled adults for shorter stints. While the back lacks a split/folding feature, it does incorporate a handy pass-through opening that leads into the 13.6 cubic-foot trunk.


Like its autoshifted opposite number, the new 6-speed Type-S packs the same potent 3.2-liter SOHC V-6 underhood. Fitted with Honda's VTEC (Variable Valve Timing and Lift Electronic Control) package to optimize performance in the upper rev ranges, this free-revving motivator churns out 260 horsepower at 6,100 rpm and 232 lb.-ft. of torque from 3,500-5,500 rpm. Those output numbers represent gains of 35 and 16 units, respectively, over a standard CL. Their real-world impact is further magnified by the fact that a manually shifted Type-S is 64 pounds lighter and enjoys a slightly improved (62/38 vs. 63/37 percent) front/rear weight bias. Collectively, they help transform an already engaging driving experience into an exhilarating one. Although its somewhat abrupt clutch engagement demands a bit of left-foot finesse on launches, the well-matched gears, short, crisp throws and overall precise feel of the new 6-speed should quickly endear it to all who prefer to shift for themselves.

2003 Acura CL Type-S engine
The new 6-speed Type-S packs the same potent 3.2-liter SOHC V-6 underhood, churning out horsepower at 6,100 rpm and 232 lb.-ft. of torque from 3,500-5,500 rpm.

Helping put that go-power to its best use is a well-sorted chassis that combines double wishbones up front and a rear multilink setup in a formula that seriously blurs the distinction between front and rear drive with respect to overall handling prowess. These basic elements operate in consort with a coil spring and a progressively valved gas-pressure shock at each corner plus front/rear anti-roll bars, a package that minimizes body roll and helps keep the Type-S securely planted at all times.


Toss in a nicely weighted rack-and-pinion power steering unit and you've got a maximum Acura that exudes supreme confidence whether you're just cruising along or in full-attack mode on some twisty two-lane. Torque steer is virtually banished from this hot CL's personality, and the limited-slip differential does a great job of smoothly and positively transferring the formidable power that is one hand to the wheel with the best grip. When the inevitable push finally does arrive in tighter turns, a touch of trailing throttle encourages just enough tail slip to set up a quick exit with minimal drama.


Only two minor items keep the Type-S from racking up perfect 10s across the scorecards. The first is a surprisingly large 39.4-foot turning circle, which requires a bit of preplanning when you're navigating a crowded parking lot. The second is tires. Although the Type-S wears 215/50VR17 Michelin MXV4s in place of the 205/60VR16 MXV4-Plus rubber used on a standard CL, its suspension clearly has enough in reserve to handle wider—and stickier—alternatives. Even with these blatantly sensible shoes, the Type-S is stunningly good. Fitting something with a bit more bite would only elevate its road-raging potential to an even higher plateau. If Acura doesn't do it, owners will.

Continued on Page 3

Copyright autoMedia.com 2000-2008

 


Related Articles
2003 Mazda RX8
2003.5 MAZDASPEED Protegé
2003 Mitsubishi Eclipse GTS
2003 Chevrolet Corvette Z06
2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1


autoMedia Car Blog
Ouch! Small Pickup Truck Crash Tests - Painful Results
As gas prices soared past $4/gallon nationwide, and full-sized pickup trunk sales plummeted by double-digit percentages, some corners of the auto indu ... more...

Official: 2010 Lotus Evora 2+2
Lotus’ first all-new model in 13 years was unveiled at the British International Motor Show this week, the Evora. (We’re partial to the “Project Eagle ... more...

Car Sales Reaching the Lowest Levels Since 1993
It can’t be ignored that on the same day J.D. Power and Associates spreads doom about light-vehicle sales being expected to drop to the lowest levels ... more...


Forum Highlights
Need help putting brakes on 1961 Ford Ranchero
 I can't remember how my passenger side rear emergency brake attaches to the rear shoe. I know it attaches to the top with a pin and a horsesho ... more...

Re: engine smoke
he is right. Piston ring migth have not been the same. are they genuine parts? or its timing belt was'nt did right.   ______________________ ... more...

Re: 2000 Ranger front brake pads and rotors
don't worry about the sound. Tha's a good sound, it means the pads are working well, soon it will be gone. New pads ussually does that. Because its st ... more...


Car Buying Guide

QUICK SEARCH:


Specs, prices, photos & more
SEARCH BY BODY STYLE:
FREE New Car Price Quote
Get the best price - it's easy!

Used Car Buying Guide


2000-2008 autoMedia.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.