Reviews
2002 Acura NSX
Continued from Page 1
2002 Acura NSX Engine
Two V-6s are available: a 252-hp 3.0L mated to a 4-speed automatic or a 290-hp 3.2L (shown) that's backed by a 6-speed manual.

During the hundreds of miles of test-driving, we continually came back to the NSX equipped with the six-speed. This wasn't entirely because of the extra performance extracted from the engine, but it seems much more natural to feel the shifter in our hands as we carved through the curves. Speaking of which, the NSX shines on mountain roads as well as on the racetrack. Like a good hunting dog, give the NSX free rein to run with its nose to the ground and it's extremely happy—it pivots on a dime as you guide it around turn after turn.


Part of the reason for this outstanding ability is the all-aluminum construction of the platform and the heavy use of aluminum components in the superior suspension system. The four-wheel, double-wishbone suspension is comprised of aluminum-alloy control arms and hubs to minimize unsprung weight, which translates to better handling. Further reducing weight, the NSX features aluminum subframes for both front and rear suspensions. The spring rates have been re-tuned to further enhance the handling, and the rear gets a larger stabilizer bar.


Every time we test a new vehicle, we notice how the tires influence the vehicle's handling. Acura has increased the size of both front and rear tires, adding an increased bite on the road. The front tires are now 215/40R17 while the rears are 255/40R17.

2002 Acura NSX Front
Aerodynamically designed HID headlights help cut the NSX's coefficient of drag from .32 to .30.

Having a vehicle that handles and performs at the levels of the NSX is a tremendous experience. However, that same vehicle better have the ability to keep the tires firmly planted on the road. And that means having equally high performance in its braking system. Large four-wheel vented disc brakes make bringing the NSX to a stop nearly effortless. The 11.9-inch front rotors get dual-piston calipers while the 12.1-inch rears have single-pistons.


We noticed no fading or other problems during our full day of aggressive testing. In fact, we were very impressed by the brakes' ability to handle the heavy foot we gave them. But then, if you're going to have a vehicle that is every bit as capable of reaching its top speed of 175 mph, you'd better have confidence in your brakes. We did.

Continued on Page 3

Copyright autoMedia.com 2000-2009



 



Related Articles
2002 Toyota Celica GT-S
2002 BMW M3 Coupe
2002 Chrysler Sebring LXi Coupe
2002 MINI Cooper
2002 Volkswagen New Beetle Turbo S


autoMedia Car Blog
Toyota Announces Unintended Acceleration Fix
In a safety drama that has unfolded since summer, when a high-profile case of unintended acceleration brought floor mat issues to national prominence, ... more...

Sneak peek: 2011 Kia Amanti
Kia unveiled its all-new K7 sedan in Korea today, offering the world a sneak peek at a car known as Cadenza in the Middle East and Amanti in North Ame ... more...

Koenigsegg Hits Brakes On Deal to Buy Saab
Koenigsegg Group has walked away from a proposed purchase of Saab from General Motors. The conglomerate lead by supercar-maker Koenigsegg had previous ... more...


Forum Highlights
oldsmobile -TCC
 I have a 1998 oldsmobile, achieva,  v6, auto transmission, 135,000 miles, it seemed to be missing , after changing plugs and wires, throttl ... more...

Re: Aluminum wheels and a flat tire
I am sure you have your tire changed by now, but this is a common problem when using aluminum wheels.  Once you realize you have a problem, hitti ... more...

Re: Chevy 3.8L Engine cutout
 I would call it in intermediate job.  You will need some special tools to do it, but if you have some experience doing repairs, and not jus ... more...


Car Buying Guide

QUICK SEARCH:


Specs, prices, photos & more
SEARCH BY BODY STYLE:
FREE New Car Price Quote
Get the best price - it's easy!
Zip Code

Used Car Buying Guide


2000-2009 autoMedia.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.